c++ - When is the planned date for C++0x to be released into the wild? -

We are always waiting to see if it is going to be a complete language, and yet it does not seem formal For the release of definition only committees and discussions and amendments

Is anyone aware of the planned deadline for C ++ 0x or will we start calling it C ++ 1x?

OK, the committee is currently very busy working on the next revision - from each meeting several papers Is the first, which is a good sign of the effort going to the new standard:

There is some relation (but in this sense it is convinced that they do not publish a standard to calm the public Will, however, understand the urgency involved in it) Straststr by calling only a paper Say that we should take a second look at the concepts and make sure that they can be as simple - and have proposed a suitable solution. [Edit] This letter is available for those interested in it.

C ++ 0x will be a major improvement on C ++ in many relationships, and unless I talk to the committee - my hope is that it will be by the end of 2010.

[edit] Being underlined by a commentator, it is worth appreciating that there is a significant concern among some committee members that either the quality of the standard or if concepts are included, then schedule (Late 2010) will suffer:. But will these problems be proven, it is worth being patient - it will be more information that once the committee has finished its meeting in Frankfurt this July (later meeting the meeting late July, August In the beginning can be expected).

Personally, I think it will not be a big loss to get the standard without concepts (maintain the schedule at the end of 2010), and then add them by making a TR, while They also have difficulty in finding out more experienced committee members (about concepts) - but I will postpone the committee here - unless they have claimed or they have not been right, Most of them are more worthy of these decisions and more worthy of some of them. Our belief if history is an indicator - I make a mistake in believing in their tendency (on me) and believe that something fair between them Was agreed.

For some perspective, and because of which there is no frustration about these obstacles, it compares to the comparison of the horoscope community - Brendan Ich, producer, has something very different for next revision Different design targets were Encrypt (AS5) from some other similar talented magicians in the Ekascript community - many meetings were discussed and after a lot of discussion (some of it was hot); Due to the frenzy of activity, a very good agreement, which resulted in family 5 (including conflict, all in 1-2 years), which would be an excellent and practical, but far more conservative than the euch has been proposed initially Was the javascript modification I hope the same as C ++ (acknowledging that C ++ is a very large language - but then much effort has been made);